The privatization of the space industry has a negative impact on the environment – Scot Scoop News – Advice Eating

The room inutrie has developed rapidly in recent decades, with the dominance of economic giants suggesting ties to NASA. The development of the industry suggests concerns about the environment given the current problems with global warming and climate change.

Since the 1990s, control of the space exploration industry has gradually been transferred to private companies. This is also known as the privatization of the space industry.

With new plans and missions for the future of exploration, Determination coupled with competition is high as more new private companies compete for dominance in the industry. The questionable incentives of well-known private companies such as Spacebar-X and Blue Origin entering space are questioned by the general public after correlations have been made between their projects and environmental concerns.

The context of privatization in the space industry is connected and established by the history of NASA.

Until the 1960s, NASA was fully government funded, with space travel and internal relations remaining tied to the US government. Suddenly, in the 1970s, NASA’s budget was tightened by the government because NASA has been pouring resources into projects that the government did not consider as important as reaching the moon (which was the current goal of the US government). Both Congress and the American public were no longer fascinated by NASA’s discoveries, and after they lost popularity, all of their public funding was cut.

While public expeditions lost funding, the private sector slowly expanded. After Columbia missile disaster in 2003, NASA’s budget was limited to just 0.68% of the government’s total investment, around $20 billion. At the peak of NASA funding during the Apollo space program in the early 1960s, the government spent $49.4 billion on the project, a far larger sum than the government is spending today.

In 2004, President George W. Bush passed tUS space exploration policy, the US government’s agreement to fund NASA in relation to rocket construction for fear of relying heavily on Russia for transport. This law was never fully enacted, and even today NASA remains partially in partnership with and uses Russia Soyuz rocket as a means of transport.

Blue Origin and SpaceX are the two best known companies in the space industry today and of course the most influential in the development of space exploration as a whole.

Space X was founded in 2002 by Tesla CEO and billionaire Elon Musk. Musk’s first job in the industry was to build a large spacecraft specifically designed to carry passengers to and from Mars and the International Space Station (ISS).

With the success of Musk’s first missile launch in 2008, he began privately selling missiles to the US government at a flat rate of $2.6 billion for six missile launches. The price of launching rockets was relatively low, and this new figure intrigued NASA. This deal secured Space-X supremacy 60% of the global commercial rocket market and a six-year deal with NASA that puts Space-X ahead of other private companies.

NASA’s acceptance of this agreement indicated its support for entry into the new privatized space sector.

Speaking at the Kennedy Center in Florida, the recently retired NASA administrator said: Steve Jurczyksaid: “We will conduct the research and technology development and be the trailblazers for further support of the commercial space sector.”

Founded in 2000 by Jeff Bezos, Blue Origin was the first company to land a $500 million contract with the US Air Force, supplying missiles for the Army. Aside from partnering with the Air Force, Bezos is working to reduce some of the pollutants currently ravaging the Earth’s environment.

We need to take all of the heavy industry, all of the pollution industry, and put it in space. And keep Earth as the beautiful jewel of a planet that it is,” Bezos claimed in an interview with NBC News.

Like many others, Bezos sees climate change as a significant problem and believes his straightforward solution to reducing the impact of climate change would be beneficial.

President Biden agreed with Bezosas the government seeks to team up with NASA and Bezos through a separate deal.

Corresponding The hill, “The development of an industrial space infrastructure will be the work of several decades. NASA’s commercial partners will compete to create a transportation network that will send people and tools into space.”

Industrial factories and mining sites are two of the most productive polluters industries of the worldand because of this, Biden and Bezos believe their removal from Earth would positively impact global warming to some extent.

That plan aside, Blue Origin is geared towards that pursue an interest in space travel, using large pods to carry humans in and out of space. However, unlike Space-X, these capsules are specifically designed and intended for commercial purposes.

“While these entrepreneurs [Bezos] begin to take private [to space], passengers have by and large been very wealthy up until now. That raises the question of who ultimately benefits,” he said Christian DavenportAuthor of The Space Barons and reporter for The Washington Post.

By using a quick-fix approach to tackling climate change, moving heavy industry to space, the wound is still open and the earth is still in distress.

The carbon footprint of launching into space with [Bezos’s rockets] is incredibly high, almost 100 times higher than on a long-haul flight. It’s incredibly problematic if we want to be environmentally conscious and consider our carbon footprint. ”

– Eloise Marais

“The carbon footprint of launching into space with [Bezos’s rockets] is incredibly high, almost 100 times higher than on a long-haul flight. It’s incredibly problematic when we want to be environmentally conscious and consider our carbon footprint,” said Eloise Marais, professor of physical geography at University College London, in an interview with Vox Magazine.

Bezos has claimed that liquid hydrogen and oxygen, two possible greenhouse gases, fuel Blue Origin rockets and are alleged to be less polluting.

Corresponding aeroqual: “a common air pollutant is nitrogen dioxide [a combination of nitrogen and oxygen].”

Nitrogen and oxygen form liquid hydrogen, meaning Blue Origin actually contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. While most people are aware of climate change and its common causes, the space industry’s impact on global emissions remains largely unexplored.

While the space industry makes money, resources that would be dedicated to solving problems on Earth are instead used for space exploration as more importance is attached to the industry without disseminating knowledge describing how this can be harmful to the environment can.

AmazonBezos’ original company, which sells products either through retailers or their own brand, manufactures over 456 million pounds of plastic per year.

According to the Plastic Pollution Coalition“Of which 91% [plastic] is likely to pollute nature, end up in landfills or be incinerated, much of it being “sent away” to countries in the Global South from North America and Europe.

The Amazon contributes not only to land pollution, but also to marine pollution.

A report from oceana showed that Amazon was “responsible for polluting the world’s oceans with more than 22 million pounds of plastic pollution.”

Musk openly announced his plans in January this year Drill near a launch pad in Texas in search of natural gas to power SpaceX rockets and in particular the Starship model. According to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, methane emissions occur throughout well production.

That American Association for the Advancement of Science said, that “[methane emissions happen throughout] drilling production.”

Because methane is used as a fuel for rockets, it can, when combined with liquid oxygen, release large amounts of carbon dioxide into the surrounding atmosphere. With CO2 emissions that pose a serious threat to the environmentMusk’s rocket would add to the problem.

The special Space X location in Texas, near Boca Chica in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, is home to numerous wildlife, including shorebirds and sea turtles.

US government lawmakers passed legislation in 2013 that allowed Space-X to use Boca Chica as a proving ground and close Texas Highway 4 if necessary. debris from the rocket Testing has been harming wildlife ever since and could permanently damage the environment if not properly protected.

As the industry continues to expand, Bezos is trying to make amends for the environment.

According to CNBC, Bezos said so in a speech at the United Nations Humanity must “stand together to protect our world.

He explains the 11 billion tons of carbon emissions currently being absorbed by forests and the dangers this poses to the green environment. He also pledged $10 billion to fight climate change, of which $1 billion is already going towards environmental protections.

From the average person’s perspective, it might seem like Bezos is finally taking a stand on climate change, but his work in the space industry is different.

Student voices show differing opinions on the issue of climate change related to the privatization of the space industry.

“I feel like there’s going to come a point where the ultra-rich will have to give to fix the planet and they’ll feel responsible,” said Prithvi Dixit, a sophomore at Carlmont.

However, Kaitlin Chow, a freshman student and climate activist, disagrees.

If [Bezos] cares about his integrity and the planet, he should make many efforts to less pollute the environment, especially when he has such a great wealth. As climate change worsens, the problem seems to be passed on to every generation; I believe that the plans for space will make solving climate change much more difficult and lengthy, since all of this money should go into fixing climate change instead of into space,” Chow said. “We should focus on helping our planet before exploring others.”

If [Bezos] cares about his integrity and the planet, he should make many efforts to less pollute the environment, especially when he has such a great wealth. As climate change worsens, the problem seems to be passed on to every generation; I believe that the plans for space are going to make solving climate change much more difficult and lengthy, since all this money should go into fixing climate change instead of into space. We should focus on helping our planet before exploring others.”

– Kaitlin Chow

Leave a Comment