Capstick, S. et al. in Emission Gap Report 2020 CH 6 (UNEP, 2020).
van Vuuren, DP et al. Alternative paths to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. nat. Climate. To change 8th391-397 (2018).
Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. behavior buzz. decisions procedures. 50179-211 (1991).
Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, GA & Kalof, L. A value-belief-norm theory in support of social movements: the case of environmentalism. To hum. Ecol. rev 681-97 (1999).
Klöckner, CA A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behavior – a meta-analysis. global Vicinity. To change 231028-1038 (2013).
Klöckner, CA & Blöbaum, A. A comprehensive action determination model: Towards a broader understanding of ecological behavior using the example of the choice of transport. J. Environment. psychological 30574-586 (2010).
Nielsen, KS, Cologna, V., Lange, F., Brick, C. & Stern, PC Arguments for an impact-oriented environmental psychology. J. Environment. psychological. 74101559 (2021).
Kaiser, FG & Wilson, M. Goal-Directed Conservation Behavior: The Specific Composition of a General Performance. pers. Individually. Differ. 361531-1544 (2004).
Brick, C., Sherman, DK & Kim, HS “Green to be seen” and “Brown to stay down”: Visibility mitigates identity’s effect on pro-environmental behavior. J. Environment. psychological 51226-238 (2017).
Dietz T, Gardner GT, Gilligan J, Stern PC & Vandenbergh MP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Science. United States of America 10618452-18456 (2009).
Allen, S., Dietz, T. & McCright, A.M. Measuring energy efficiency behaviors of households considering behavioral plasticity in the United States. energy res. society Science. 10133-140 (2015).
Kim, H.-S. & Damhorst, ML Environmental awareness and clothing consumption. Cloth. Text. Resolution J 16126-133 (1998).
Bleys, B., Defloor, B., Van Ootegem, L. & Verhofstadt, E. The environmental impact of individual behavior: self-assessment versus ecological footprint. Vicinity. behavior 50187-212 (2018).
Kennedy, E. H. et al. Do we count what counts? A closer look at environmental awareness, green behavior and carbon footprint. Local Environment. 20220-236 (2015).
Moser, S. & Kleinhückelkotten, S. Good intentions but small impact: divergent importance of motivational and socioeconomic determinants in explaining behavior, energy use, and carbon footprint. Vicinity. behavior 6626-656 (2018).
Ivanova, D. et al. Quantification of the climate protection potential of consumption options. Vicinity. Resolution Latvian. 15093001 (2020).
Peters, G., Li, M. & Lenzen, M. The need to decelerate fast fashion in a hot climate – a global sustainability perspective on the apparel industry. J Clean. prod. 295126390 (2021).
Niinimäki, K. et al. The Fast Fashion Environmental Award. nat. Rev. Earth Environment. 1189-200 (2020).
Kraha, A., Turner, H., Nimon, K., Zientek, LR & Henson, RK Tools to support the interpretation of multiple regression in the face of multicollinearity. Front. psychological 344 (2012).
Gwozdz, W., Nielsen, KS & Müller, T. Clothing consumption from an ecological perspective: consumer segments and their behavioral patterns. sustainability 9762 (2017).
Sohn, J., Nielsen, KS, Birkved, M., Joanes, T. & Gwozdz, W. The environmental impact of clothing: Evidence from the United States and three European countries. Obtain. Prod. Consumption. 272153-2164 (2021).
Nielsen, KS From prediction to process: a self-regulatory account of environmental behavior change. J. Environment. psychological 51189-198 (2017).
Roos S, Sandin G, Zamani B, Peters G & Svanström M in Textiles and clothing sustainability (Ed. Muthu, SS) 1–45 (Springer, 2017).
A New Textile Economy: Reshaping the Future of Fashion (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2017); https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/a-new-textiles-economy
R core team R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2012); https://www.r-project.org/
Behrendt, S. Lm.beta: Adding standardized regression coefficients to lm objects. R package version 1.5-1 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lm.beta/lm.beta.pdf (2014).
Joanes, T. Personal norms in a globalized world: norm activation processes and reduced clothing consumption. J Clean. prod. 212941-949 (2019).
Joanes, T., Gwozdz, W. & Klöckner, CA Reducing personal clothing consumption: a cross-cultural validation of the comprehensive action determination model. J. Environment. psychological. 71101396 (2020).
Nielsen, KS, Gwozdz, W. & De Ridder, D. Unraveling the relationship between trait self-control and subjective well-being: the mediating role of four self-control strategies. Front. psychological 10706 (2019).
Nielsen, KS, Bauer, JM & Hofmann, W. Investigating the relationship between trait self-control and stress: Evidence for generalizability and outcome variability. J.Res.Pers. 84103901 (2020).
Nielsen, KS & Bauer, JM The merits of target assist as a self-control strategy. society Psychological Personal. Science. 10671-680 (2019).